Menu
Posted: Jul 22, 2016
Comments: 0
Author: Lou Grilli

A follow up to previous TPR article on this topic

Fraud continues to be the number one reason why a cardholder moves a card from top of wallet. And fraud isn’t cheap, costing the issuer in liability for the fraudulent charges plus the cost of reissue.  Additionally, there is the potential of lost revenue from the card being moved from the number one position in the cardholder’s wallet.

A previous thought leadership article on ThePaymentsReview.com introduced the concept of putting the cardholder in the middle of the transaction, meaning enlist the cardholder to take ownership of monitoring card purchases and respond quickly to potential fraud.

A shining example of success implementing this strategy took place over the 4th of July weekend. FIS, CSCU’s processing partner and international provider of financial services technology and outsourcing services, rolled out a new product, SecurLOCK Communicate.  The product alerts credit and debit cardholders of potential fraud in real time via a two-way interactive text message (SMS), or a voice call, or an email.

Read more
Posted: Jul 12, 2016
Comments: 0
Author: Barney Moore

Chargebacks to merchants have become a hot topic of late. And for good reason. According to a recent report by First Annapolis Consulting, chargebacks for card-present transactions increased 50% following the October 1 EMV liability shift.  While this took merchants by surprise, it did not surprise issuers who, until the October 2015 liability shift for chip cards processed at card-present non-chip terminals, were absorbing the cost of fraud for counterfeit cards. Now issuers are allowed to chargeback, or pass back the fraud to the merchants who were not processing chip cards.

Read more
Posted: Jul 5, 2016
Comments: 0
Author: Lou Grilli

Following the switch to EMV chip cards last October, merchants that implemented chip card readers at the check-out lanes noticed something besides the initial confusion – that the time to process a transaction was taking much longer versus a simple card swipe. The time varied greatly by terminal type, but a study carried out by JDA Software Group claimed that it took an extra 8 – 12 seconds per checkout. In the retail world, those are precious seconds that can drive cost for extra labor to open additional check-out lanes.

Read more
Posted: May 31, 2016
Comments: 0
Author: Bill Lehman

There was a time when a bank or credit union did not talk about fraud to their cardholders. They did not want to give the impression that their financial institution might be susceptible. The only mention was when describing the benefits of using the Visa or MasterCard brand which carries zero liability to the cardholder in case of fraud. But those days of silence on the subject are long in the past. Consumers are leery of identity theft, have started to look closely at their statements and, have learned the need to keep their social security numbers private.

 


 

Read more
Posted: May 24, 2016
Comments: 0
Author: Tom Davis

Not a day goes by where you don’t read or hear news about bitcoin and/or blockchain.  One expert in the payments world likens bitcoin to the Kardashians, the reality show stars who manage to keep themselves in the headlines even if there is nothing new to report.  Without question, bitcoin and blockchain are the darlings of the financial and business media. What follows in this article is background and insight on bitcoin, the cryptocurrency, its relationship to the blockchain, and reasons why credit unions won't need to spend too much time (if any) worrying about bitcoin.

In our second article, to be published on The Payments Review at a later date, we will take a much deeper look into the intriguing and complex world of the blockchain distributed ledger technology and why credit unions will want to keep an eye on it.

 


Read more
RSS
First234567891011

search

Featured Stories